vovamodern.blogg.se

Ithaca voice jolene
Ithaca voice jolene












ithaca voice jolene

ithaca voice jolene

Physics teacher training program going strong He is currently away from Cornell filming the documentary “Cambodia: Up from the Abyss.” Cornell Lieberman Robert Lieberman The Boys of Truxton physics books novelistįormer UTA Nolan Machado ‘14 is now teaching physics at Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar. In addition to teaching physics at Cornell and writing novels, Lieberman is also a film director. I just wanted to write an interesting story.” All my books have a kind of moral core … but I don’t want to stand on a soapbox. Though the book might be seen as a push for justice reform, Lieberman says that his goal was not to make a political statement. “I’m more interested in writing about people and the emotional life of people instead of political diatribes. Personal loss, injustice, and wrongdoing are just a few of the themes that are brought up in the novel. “The Boys of Truxton” explores the topic of youth incarceration through the intertwined lives of a teenager serving a life sentence, a Syracuse detective who wants to exonerate the boy, and a young scientist who begins teaching at the youth prison. Lieberman, a novelist with five other previously published novels, is also a senior lecturer in the Department of Physics. The Ithaca Times discusses Robert Lieberman’s recently published novel "The Boys of Truxton” in this review. Harper & Row, 1965.Senior lecturer publishes novel “The Boys of Truxton" His texts wasted no words and his delivery wasted no time. They were all too short and too crowded with facts to permit any excess of generalities and sentimentalities. No speech was more than 20 to 30 minutes in duration. And he did not hesitate to depart from strict rules of English usage when he thought adherence to them (e.g., "Our agenda are long") would grate on the listener's ear. He rarely used words he considered hackneyed: "humble," "dynamic," "glorious." He used none of the customary word fillers (e.g., "And I say to you that is a legitimate question and here is my answer"). He refused to be folksy or to include any phrase or image he considered corny, tasteless or trite. He used little or no slang, dialect, legalistic terms, contractions, clichés, elaborate metaphors or ornate figures of speech.

ithaca voice jolene

"-but with few other exceptions his sentences were lean and crisp. He had a weakness for one unnecessary phrase: "The harsh facts of the matter are. He wanted his major policy statements to be positive, specific and definite, avoiding the use of "suggest," "perhaps" and "possible alternatives for consideration." At the same time, his emphasis on a course of reason-rejecting the extremes of either side-helped produce the parallel construction and use of contrasts with which he later became identified. He wanted both his message and his language to be plain and unpretentious, but never patronizing. But if the situation required a certain vagueness, he would deliberately choose a word of varying interpretations rather than bury his imprecision in ponderous prose.įor he disliked verbosity and pomposity in his own remarks as much as he disliked them in others. Words were regarded as tools of precision, to be chosen and applied with a craftsman's care to whatever the situation required. His frequent use of dashes was of doubtful grammatical standing-but it simplified the delivery and even the publication of a speech in a manner no comma, parenthesis or semicolon could match. Sentences began, however incorrect some may have regarded it, with "And" or "But" whenever that simplified and shortened the text. He was fond of alliterative sentences, not solely for reasons of rhetoric but to reinforce the audience's recollection of his reasoning. His best paragraphs, when read aloud, often had a cadence not unlike blank verse-indeed at times key words would rhyme. The test of a text was not how it appeared to the eye, but how it sounded to the ear.

#Ithaca voice jolene series#

Our chief criterion was always audience comprehension and comfort, and this meant: (1) short speeches, short clauses and short words, wherever possible (2) a series of points or propositions in numbered or logical sequence wherever appropriate and (3) the construction of sentences, phrases and paragraphs in such a manner as to simplify, clarify and emphasize. Neither of us had any special training in composition, linguistics or semantics. We were not conscious of following the elaborate techniques later ascribed to these speeches by literary analysts. The Kennedy style of speech-writing-our style, I am not reluctant to say, for he never pretended that he had time to prepare first drafts for all his speeches-evolved gradually over the years.














Ithaca voice jolene